Filed: Apr. 12, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: No. 99-40652 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-40652 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BARTOLO RODRIGUEZ-JUAREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-549 - - - - - - - - - - April 12, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Bartolo Rodriguez-Juarez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for i
Summary: No. 99-40652 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-40652 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BARTOLO RODRIGUEZ-JUAREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-549 - - - - - - - - - - April 12, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Bartolo Rodriguez-Juarez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for il..
More
No. 99-40652
-1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-40652
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BARTOLO RODRIGUEZ-JUAREZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-98-CR-549
- - - - - - - - - -
April 12, 2000
Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Bartolo Rodriguez-Juarez appeals from his guilty-plea
conviction for illegal reentry following deportation in violation
of 8 U.S.C. ยง 1326. Rodriguez contends that the district court
erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment, in which
he argued that his prior deportation proceedings violated his
right to due process. He concedes that the only issue raised in
this appeal is foreclosed by our decision in United States v.
Benitez-Villafuerte,
186 F.3d 651, 656-60 (5th Cir. 1999), cert.
denied,
120 S. Ct. 838 (2000). The decision of the district
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-40652
-2-
court is AFFIRMED.