Filed: Oct. 18, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-41085 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN SAUCEDO-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-99-CR-174-1 - - - - - - - - - - October 17, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Juan Saucedo-Vasquez appeals his conviction for illegal reentry after deportation
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-41085 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN SAUCEDO-VASQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-99-CR-174-1 - - - - - - - - - - October 17, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Juan Saucedo-Vasquez appeals his conviction for illegal reentry after deportation p..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-41085
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN SAUCEDO-VASQUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. M-99-CR-174-1
- - - - - - - - - -
October 17, 2000
Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Juan Saucedo-Vasquez appeals his conviction for illegal
reentry after deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. ยง 1326. Saucedo
contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to
suppress and to dismiss the indictment, in which he argued that
his prior deportation proceedings violated his right to due
process. Saucedo concedes that the issue raised in this appeal
is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Benitez-
Villafuerte,
186 F.3d 651 (5th Cir. 1999), but raises his
contention solely to preserve it for review by the Supreme Court.
We affirm the judgment of the district court.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-41085
-2-
AFFIRMED.