Filed: Jun. 05, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-41124 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus REFUGIO RODRIGUEZ, also known as Rogelio Saldana Jimenez, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-160-ALL - June 5, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Refugio Rodriguez (Rodriguez) has moved
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-41124 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus REFUGIO RODRIGUEZ, also known as Rogelio Saldana Jimenez, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-99-CR-160-ALL - June 5, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Refugio Rodriguez (Rodriguez) has moved ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-41124
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
REFUGIO RODRIGUEZ,
also known as Rogelio Saldana Jimenez,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-99-CR-160-ALL
--------------------
June 5, 2000
Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Refugio
Rodriguez (Rodriguez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Rodriguez has received a copy of counsel's motion and
brief and has filed a response. Our independent review of the
brief, the record, and Rodriguez's response discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. P. 42.2.