Filed: Jun. 19, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-50201 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GILMAR SALAS MORALES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-88-CR-76-ALL - June 14, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Gilmar Salas Morales has filed a motion to withdraw from representation of Morales and a b
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-50201 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GILMAR SALAS MORALES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-88-CR-76-ALL - June 14, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Gilmar Salas Morales has filed a motion to withdraw from representation of Morales and a br..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-50201
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GILMAR SALAS MORALES,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. SA-88-CR-76-ALL
--------------------
June 14, 2000
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Gilmar Salas Morales has
filed a motion to withdraw from representation of Morales and a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Morales has not responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent
review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issue. Accordingly, Morales’s court-appointed attorney’s motion
to withdraw is GRANTED; the attorney is excused from further
responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.