Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Morales, 99-50201 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-50201 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 19, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-50201 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GILMAR SALAS MORALES, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-88-CR-76-ALL - June 14, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Gilmar Salas Morales has filed a motion to withdraw from representation of Morales and a b
More
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 99-50201
                          Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GILMAR SALAS MORALES,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                          --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Western District of Texas
                        USDC No. SA-88-CR-76-ALL
                          --------------------
                              June 14, 2000

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Gilmar Salas Morales has

filed a motion to withdraw from representation of Morales and a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Morales has not responded to counsel’s motion.    Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue.     Accordingly, Morales’s court-appointed attorney’s motion

to withdraw is GRANTED; the attorney is excused from further

responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.     See 5TH   CIR.

R. 42.2.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer