Filed: Jan. 14, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: No. 99-50881 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-50881 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ENRIQUE GOMEZ-SALAZAR, also known as Jessie Jesus Bonilla, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-99-CR-227-1 - January 12, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Government challenges the sentence imposed by
Summary: No. 99-50881 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-50881 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus ENRIQUE GOMEZ-SALAZAR, also known as Jessie Jesus Bonilla, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-99-CR-227-1 - January 12, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Government challenges the sentence imposed by t..
More
No. 99-50881
-1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-50881
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
ENRIQUE GOMEZ-SALAZAR, also
known as Jessie Jesus Bonilla,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. DR-99-CR-227-1
--------------------
January 12, 2000
Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM, and STEWART,
Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Government challenges the sentence imposed by the
district court, arguing that the district court erred in failing
to assess a 16-level sentencing enhancement, pursuant to U.S.S.G.
§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A), based on its finding that Enrique Gomez-
Salazar’s (“Gomez”) prior convictions for illegally transporting
aliens were not aggravated-felony convictions for purposes of the
enhancement. In United States v. Monjaras-Castaneda, 190 F.3d
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-50881
-2-
326, 330-31 (5th Cir. 1999), decided after the district court
entered its judgment in the instant case, this court held that
prior convictions for illegally transporting aliens within the
United States constitute aggravated-felony convictions for
purposes of the 16-level sentencing enhancement. Accordingly,
the district court’s judgment is VACATED, and the case is
REMANDED for resentencing.
VACATED AND REMANDED.