Filed: Apr. 14, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: No. 99-60276 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-60276 Conference Calendar ANTHONY HOSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus BUDDY PASSON, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 5:96-CV-181-BrS - - - - - - - - - - April 13, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Anthony Hoston, Mississippi state prisoner # 76712, appeals the magistrate judge’s
Summary: No. 99-60276 -1- IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-60276 Conference Calendar ANTHONY HOSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus BUDDY PASSON, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 5:96-CV-181-BrS - - - - - - - - - - April 13, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Anthony Hoston, Mississippi state prisoner # 76712, appeals the magistrate judge’s ..
More
No. 99-60276
-1-
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-60276
Conference Calendar
ANTHONY HOSTON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
BUDDY PASSON,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 5:96-CV-181-BrS
- - - - - - - - - -
April 13, 2000
Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Anthony Hoston, Mississippi state prisoner # 76712, appeals
the magistrate judge’s decision to grant the Defendant’s motion
for judgment as a matter of law and dismiss Hoston’s 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 civil rights complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(c). On
appeal, Hoston re-urges the merits of his claim that the Sheriff
of Yazoo County, Buddy Passon, denied him adequate medical care
for a broken nose sustained during an altercation with another
inmate. Hoston has failed to identify any error in the
magistrate judge’s findings of fact or conclusions of law. See
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-60276
-2-
Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a); Halpern v. Lexington Ins. Co.,
715 F.2d
191, 192 (5th Cir. 1983)(findings of fact are presumptively
correct and shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous).
Accordingly, the magistrate judge’s decision is AFFIRMED.