Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Sample v. Yazoo Valley Elec, 99-60538 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-60538 Visitors: 15
Filed: May 04, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit _ No. 99-60538 _ SAMUEL D. SAMPLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YAZOO VALLEY ELECTRIC POWER ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee. _ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (5:98-CV-107-BrS) _ May 1, 2000 Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM1: Samuel D. Sample, an employee of Yazoo Valley Electric Power Association (Yazoo Valley), appeals the decision below gran
More
                         UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                  For the Fifth Circuit
                      __________________________________________

                                     No. 99-60538
                      _________________________________________

                                     SAMUEL D. SAMPLE,

                                                                               Plaintiff-Appellant,

                                                v.


                   YAZOO VALLEY ELECTRIC POWER ASSOCIATION,

                                                                              Defendant-Appellee.

                      __________________________________________

                       On Appeal from the United States District Court
                            for the Southern District of Mississippi
                                      (5:98-CV-107-BrS)
                      __________________________________________
                                          May 1, 2000

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM1:

       Samuel D. Sample, an employee of Yazoo Valley Electric Power Association (Yazoo

Valley), appeals the decision below granting summary judgment in favor of Yazoo Valley on

Sample’s claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, et seq,

and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 701. After carefully considering the parties’

briefs, the record, and oral arguments, we affirm summary judgment of these claims based on the

conclusions of fact and law given in the district court’s memorandum opinion and order.




   1
    Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.
47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer