Filed: Oct. 10, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-60880 Summary Calendar _ ZORAN MATIC, Petitioner, versus JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent. _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A72 446 565 _ October 6, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Zoran Matic has filed a petition for review of an order of removal issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals. The respondent’s motion to dismiss the petiti
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-60880 Summary Calendar _ ZORAN MATIC, Petitioner, versus JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent. _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A72 446 565 _ October 6, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Zoran Matic has filed a petition for review of an order of removal issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals. The respondent’s motion to dismiss the petitio..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 99-60880
Summary Calendar
_____________________
ZORAN MATIC,
Petitioner,
versus
JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney
General,
Respondent.
_________________________________________________________________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A72 446 565
_________________________________________________________________
October 6, 2000
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Zoran Matic has filed a petition for review of an order of
removal issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals. The
respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition for lack of
jurisdiction is GRANTED. Lopez-Elias v. Reno,
209 F.3d 788, 790
n.1 (5th Cir. 2000), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. July 28, 2000)
(No. 00-164); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C). Matic’s motions for bail
pending appeal and to adduce additional evidence are DENIED.
PETITION DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.