Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Matic v. Reno, 99-60880 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-60880 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 10, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-60880 Summary Calendar _ ZORAN MATIC, Petitioner, versus JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent. _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A72 446 565 _ October 6, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Zoran Matic has filed a petition for review of an order of removal issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals. The respondent’s motion to dismiss the petiti
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

                         _____________________

                              No. 99-60880
                            Summary Calendar
                         _____________________

ZORAN MATIC,

                                                                Petitioner,
                                 versus

JANET RENO, U.S. Attorney
General,

                                                      Respondent.
_________________________________________________________________

              Petition for Review of an Order of the
                   Board of Immigration Appeals
                        BIA No. A72 446 565
_________________________________________________________________
                          October 6, 2000

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Zoran Matic has filed a petition for review of an order of

removal   issued   by   the   Board   of    Immigration     Appeals.      The

respondent’s   motion    to   dismiss      the   petition    for   lack   of

jurisdiction is GRANTED.      Lopez-Elias v. Reno, 
209 F.3d 788
, 790

n.1 (5th Cir. 2000), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. July 28, 2000)

(No. 00-164); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C).          Matic’s motions for bail

pending appeal and to adduce additional evidence are DENIED.

                                                      PETITION DISMISSED.

     *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer