Filed: Feb. 13, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-20260 _ LYNN WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF HUMBLE, TX,, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Civil Docket #H-99-CV-510 _ February 13, 2001 Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, DAVIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The court has considered this appeal in light of the briefs, oral arguments, and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no rever
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-20260 _ LYNN WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus CITY OF HUMBLE, TX,, Defendant-Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Civil Docket #H-99-CV-510 _ February 13, 2001 Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, DAVIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The court has considered this appeal in light of the briefs, oral arguments, and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no revers..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________________
No. 00-20260
_______________________
LYNN WRIGHT,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CITY OF HUMBLE, TX,,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
Civil Docket #H-99-CV-510
_________________________________________________________________
February 13, 2001
Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, DAVIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The court has considered this appeal in light of the
briefs, oral arguments, and pertinent portions of the record.
Having done so, we find no reversible error and affirm for
essentially the reasons stated by the district judge. In
particular, we conclude that this case falls within the narrow
range of cases cited by the Supreme Court in Reeves v. Sanderson
Plumbing,
530 U.S. 133,
120 S. Ct. 2097, 2105 (2000), in which any
direct or circumstantial evidence of age discrimination is far
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
overshadowed by the employer’s evidence of legitimate non-
discriminatory grounds for Wright’s demotion. Summary judgment was
therefore properly granted to the defendant.
AFFIRMED.
2