Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Glover, 00-20575 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-20575 Visitors: 22
Filed: Apr. 13, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-20575 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHAWN ALLEN GLOVER, also known as Demarco A. Glover, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-628-3 - April 12, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Shawn Allen Glover on appeal has moved to withdraw and has
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 00-20575
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SHAWN ALLEN GLOVER,
also known as Demarco A. Glover,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. H-99-CR-628-3
                      --------------------
                         April 12, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Shawn Allen Glover on appeal

has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders

v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Glover has received a copy

of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response.

     Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.   Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.    5TH CIR. R.

42.2.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer