Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rodriguez v. Natl Union Fire Ins, 00-20591 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-20591 Visitors: 47
Filed: Jan. 03, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-20591 Summary Calendar DELIA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA; ET AL Defendants, NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, Defendant - Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H:93-CV-3164 - - - - - - - - - - January 3, 2001 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENN
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-20591 Summary Calendar DELIA RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA; ET AL Defendants, NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, Defendant - Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H:93-CV-3164 - - - - - - - - - - January 3, 2001 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Delia Rodriguez appeals from the judgment of the district court that dismissed without prejudice, her bad faith claim against Nations Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The appellant’s asserted compliance with the requirement in the district * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. court’s stay order that status reports be periodically filed with respect to her underlying workers’ compensation claim before the Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission, did not relieve her of her duty to prosecute her bad faith claim. For nearly four years after her workers’ compensation claim was settled she took no action to prosecute her bad faith claim in the district court. Repeated reports to the court that she had not settled her claims with the appellee and that appellee had not responded to her settlement offer does not excuse her failure to prosecute her claims. Once the basis for the stay order ceased to exist, appellant should have proceeded to have the stay lifted and taken action to prosecute her claims. Accordingly, we agree that the reasons recited for the district court’s dismissal, in its order dated June 1, provided a sound basis for the dismissal of Rodriguez’s claim. No abuse of discretion having been shown, the judgment is AFFIRMED.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer