Filed: Mar. 19, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-20678 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOHN E. CORMIER, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-254-1 - March 16, 2001 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent John E. Cormier in his direct criminal appeal has filed a motion for leav
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-20678 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOHN E. CORMIER, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-99-CR-254-1 - March 16, 2001 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent John E. Cormier in his direct criminal appeal has filed a motion for leave..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-20678
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOHN E. CORMIER,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-99-CR-254-1
--------------------
March 16, 2001
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent John E.
Cormier in his direct criminal appeal has filed a motion for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Cormier has not filed a
response.
Our independent review of the brief filed by counsel and of
the record reveals no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-20678
-2-
counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED.