Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Marche v. United States, 00-21032 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-21032 Visitors: 27
Filed: Jun. 13, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-21032 Conference Calendar BERNARD MARCHE, In the Matter of the Extradition of, Petitioner-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Movant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CV-2910 - - - - - - - - - - June 13, 2001 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Bernard Marche appeals from the district court’s final order o
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-21032 Conference Calendar BERNARD MARCHE, In the Matter of the Extradition of, Petitioner-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Movant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CV-2910 - - - - - - - - - - June 13, 2001 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Bernard Marche appeals from the district court’s final order of extradition ordering that Marche be extradited to France to face criminal charges. This court has previously denied Marche’s request for a stay of extradition pending this appeal. The Supreme Court, through Justice Scalia, also denied Marche’s request for a stay of extradition. Following these rulings, Marche was extradited to France. The Government has moved to dismiss Marche’s appeal as moot, asserting that Marche’s * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-21032 -2- extradition to France terminates the jurisdiction of this court. The Government is correct, and the motion to dismiss Marche’s appeal as moot is GRANTED. Marche’s motions for dismissal of court-appointed counsel and for permission to proceed pro se on appeal also are denied as MOOT. APPEAL DISMISSED.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer