Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. King, 00-31483 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-31483 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 21, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-31483 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NELSON L. KING, JR., Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (00-CR-10007-2) - June 18, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Nelson L. King, Jr., on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                              No. 00-31483
                            Summary Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                             Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NELSON L. KING, JR.,

                                             Defendant-Appellant.

                        --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Western District of Louisiana
                           (00-CR-10007-2)
                        --------------------
                            June 18, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The attorney appointed to represent Nelson L. King, Jr., on

appeal has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

King has not filed a response to counsel's motion and brief.

     Our independent review of the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal.      Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to

withdraw   is    GRANTED,     counsel   is     excused   from   further

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.       5th Cir. R.

42.2.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
DISMISSED.




             2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer