Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Aguilera-Reymundo, 00-40782 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-40782 Visitors: 46
Filed: Apr. 12, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-40782 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO ELISEO AGUILERA-REYMUNDO, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-00-CR-91-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 11, 2001 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Antonio Eliseo Aguilera- Reymundo has mov
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                           No. 00-40782
                         Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO ELISEO AGUILERA-REYMUNDO,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                        - - - - - - - - - -
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                       USDC No. M-00-CR-91-1
                        - - - - - - - - - -
                           April 11, 2001

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Antonio Eliseo Aguilera-

Reymundo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Aguilera

has not filed a response.   Our independent review of the brief

and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct

appeal.   Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.   See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer