Filed: Apr. 12, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-40782 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO ELISEO AGUILERA-REYMUNDO, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-00-CR-91-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 11, 2001 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Antonio Eliseo Aguilera- Reymundo has mov
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-40782 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTONIO ELISEO AGUILERA-REYMUNDO, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-00-CR-91-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 11, 2001 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Antonio Eliseo Aguilera- Reymundo has move..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-40782
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTONIO ELISEO AGUILERA-REYMUNDO,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. M-00-CR-91-1
- - - - - - - - - -
April 11, 2001
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Antonio Eliseo Aguilera-
Reymundo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Aguilera
has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief
and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct
appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.