Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Meza, 00-40943 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-40943 Visitors: 19
Filed: May 29, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-40943 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GUADALUPE MEZA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-00-CR-66-1 _ May 28, 2001 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Guadalupe Meza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant
More
                         IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                  FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                                                No. 00-40943
                                              Summary Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                                        Plaintiff-Appellee,
                                                      versus

GUADALUPE MEZA,

                                                                                        Defendant-Appellant.

                          __________________________________________

                             Appeal from the United States District Court
                                  for the Southern District of Texas
                                      USDC No. C-00-CR-66-1
                          __________________________________________
                                            May 28, 2001

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

        The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Guadalupe Meza has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Meza

has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a response. Our review of

the brief filed by counsel and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.




        *
           Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is
not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer