Filed: May 29, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-40943 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GUADALUPE MEZA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-00-CR-66-1 _ May 28, 2001 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Guadalupe Meza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-40943 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GUADALUPE MEZA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-00-CR-66-1 _ May 28, 2001 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Guadalupe Meza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-40943
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GUADALUPE MEZA,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-00-CR-66-1
__________________________________________
May 28, 2001
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Guadalupe Meza has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Meza
has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a response. Our review of
the brief filed by counsel and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is
not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.