Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Vela-Rios, 00-41055 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-41055 Visitors: 26
Filed: Jul. 13, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-41055 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus UVALDO VELA-RIOS, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-91-CR-304-1 - - - - - - - - - - July 13, 2001 Before JOLLY, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Uvaldo Vela-Rios (Vela) has requested leave to w
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 00-41055
                          Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                            Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

UVALDO VELA-RIOS,

                                            Defendant-Appellant.

                       - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. C-91-CR-304-1
                       - - - - - - - - - -
                          July 13, 2001

Before JOLLY, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Uvaldo

Vela-Rios (Vela) has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and

has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Vela has received a copy of counsel’s motion and

brief but has not filed a response.      Our independent review of

the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal

is DISMISSED.    See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer