Filed: Jul. 13, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-41344 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EATON CAIN, also known as Norman Smith, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-00-CR-241-1 - July 10, 2001 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eaton Cain on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw as co
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-41344 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EATON CAIN, also known as Norman Smith, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-00-CR-241-1 - July 10, 2001 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eaton Cain on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw as cou..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-41344
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EATON CAIN, also known as Norman Smith,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-00-CR-241-1
--------------------
July 10, 2001
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eaton Cain
on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed
a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Cain has not filed a response to counsel's motion and brief.
Our independent review of the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R.
42.2.
DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.