Filed: Aug. 02, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50193 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v FREDERICK LEON DEAN; JIMMIE LEE PARKER Defendants - Appellants - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-99-CR-49-2 August 1, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges and NOWLIN,* District Judge. PER CURIAM:** Defendants-Appellants appeal their jury convictions of aiding and abetting distribution of cocaine
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50193 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v FREDERICK LEON DEAN; JIMMIE LEE PARKER Defendants - Appellants - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-99-CR-49-2 August 1, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges and NOWLIN,* District Judge. PER CURIAM:** Defendants-Appellants appeal their jury convictions of aiding and abetting distribution of cocaine ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50193 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee v FREDERICK LEON DEAN; JIMMIE LEE PARKER Defendants - Appellants -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-99-CR-49-2 August 1, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges and NOWLIN,* District Judge. PER CURIAM:** Defendants-Appellants appeal their jury convictions of aiding and abetting distribution of cocaine base. They argue that certain out-of-court statements were improperly admitted into evidence, that the evidence is insufficient to support Appellant Dean’s conviction, and that cumulative error deprived Appellant Parker of a fair trial. Having considered the oral arguments, the briefs, and the pertinent parts of the record, we find no reversible error. * Chief Judge of the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation. ** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. For the above-stated reasons, Defendants’-Appellants’ convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
