Farias v. Ctr Hlth Care Svcs, 00-50311 (2001)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 00-50311
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 30, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 00-50311 GEORGE FARIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS THE CENTER FOR HEALTH CARE SERVICES; RUBEN M. PENA; SONJA M. BAGGETT; JOHN A. CHILES; DOUGLAS HARLAN; GARY N. LOOPER; ROBERT VON ROSENBERG; MALCOLM R. HESTER; HARRIET M. HELMLE, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas SA-99-CV-362-EP March 28, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Based on
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 00-50311 GEORGE FARIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS THE CENTER FOR HEALTH CARE SERVICES; RUBEN M. PENA; SONJA M. BAGGETT; JOHN A. CHILES; DOUGLAS HARLAN; GARY N. LOOPER; ROBERT VON ROSENBERG; MALCOLM R. HESTER; HARRIET M. HELMLE, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas SA-99-CV-362-EP March 28, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Based on o..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit No. 00-50311 GEORGE FARIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, VERSUS THE CENTER FOR HEALTH CARE SERVICES; RUBEN M. PENA; SONJA M. BAGGETT; JOHN A. CHILES; DOUGLAS HARLAN; GARY N. LOOPER; ROBERT VON ROSENBERG; MALCOLM R. HESTER; HARRIET M. HELMLE, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas SA-99-CV-362-EP March 28, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, DAVIS and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Based on our review of the record and consideration of the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel, we are satisfied that the district court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of defendants. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
