Filed: Jan. 24, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50445 Summary Calendar BRIDGET VALENZUELA; ET AL., Plaintiffs, BRIDGET VALENZUELA; XAVIER VALENZUELA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (USDC No. MO-99-CV-1) _ January 23, 2001 Before REAVLEY, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this o
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50445 Summary Calendar BRIDGET VALENZUELA; ET AL., Plaintiffs, BRIDGET VALENZUELA; XAVIER VALENZUELA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (USDC No. MO-99-CV-1) _ January 23, 2001 Before REAVLEY, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this op..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50445 Summary Calendar BRIDGET VALENZUELA; ET AL., Plaintiffs, BRIDGET VALENZUELA; XAVIER VALENZUELA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (USDC No. MO-99-CV-1) _______________________________________________________ January 23, 2001 Before REAVLEY, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. The judgment of the district court is affirmed for reasons given by that court in its order of March 31, 2000. Affirmed. 2
