Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Adams v. State Farm Lloyds, 00-50624 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 00-50624 Visitors: 25
Filed: May 22, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-50624 Summary Calendar _ FORREST G. ADAMS; MONIE L. ADAMS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus STATE FARM LLOYDS, INC., Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas Lower Docket Court No. SA-99-CV-844-OG _ May 21, 2001 Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Forrest and Monie Adams (“Adamses”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of S
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________________ No. 00-50624 Summary Calendar _______________________ FORREST G. ADAMS; MONIE L. ADAMS, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus STATE FARM LLOYDS, INC., Defendant - Appellee. _________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas Lower Docket Court No. SA-99-CV-844-OG _________________________________________________________________ May 21, 2001 Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Forrest and Monie Adams (“Adamses”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of State Farm Lloyds, Inc. Having considered appellants’ position in light of the briefs and pertinent portions of the record, we agree with the district court that the Adamses failed to provide evidence necessary to create a genuine issue of material fact concerning their claims for breach of contract, breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing, * Pursuant to 5th Cir. Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. Rule 47.5.4. and statutory violations. Thus, we find no reversible error of fact or law and affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the district court. AFFIRMED. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer