IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT




                            No. 00-51304
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus

MAXIMILLIANO MENDOZA-MALDONADO,


                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       - - - - - - - - - -
          Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Western District of Texas
                  USDC No. EP-00-CR-1233-ALL-DB
                       - - - - - - - - - -
                          June 15, 2001

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Maximilliano Mendoza-Maldonado appeals his sentence

following his guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after

deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.   Mendoza argues that

his sentence should not have exceeded the two-year maximum

sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).   Mendoza acknowledges that his

argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 

(1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                          No. 00-51304
                              - 2 -

Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 

(2000).

     Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres.   See 

; United States v. Dabeit, 

, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 

(2001).   Mendoza’s

argument is foreclosed by 

.

     The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief.   In its motion, the Government asks

that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an

appellee’s brief not be required.   The motion is granted.

     AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.