Filed: Dec. 21, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-51319 Summary Calendar CRISSY ANN LOZANO Petitioner - Appellant v. JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION Respondent - Appellee - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-00-CV-441 - - - - - - - - - - December 18, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Crissy Ann Lozano, Tex
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-51319 Summary Calendar CRISSY ANN LOZANO Petitioner - Appellant v. JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION Respondent - Appellee - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-00-CV-441 - - - - - - - - - - December 18, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Crissy Ann Lozano, Texa..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-51319
Summary Calendar
CRISSY ANN LOZANO
Petitioner - Appellant
v.
JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL
JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION
Respondent - Appellee
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. SA-00-CV-441
- - - - - - - - - -
December 18, 2001
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Crissy Ann Lozano, Texas prisoner #765108, appeals the
district court’s denial of her 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition
alleging, inter alia, ineffective assistance of counsel. Lozano
has failed to show that counsel was ineffective for failing to
raise the admissibility of her juvenile confession at her
transfer hearing, her sentencing proceeding, or on appeal because
she has failed to show that she was prejudiced by counsel’s
alleged errors. Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668, 687-88,
691-92 (1984). She has also failed to show that counsel was
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-51319
-2-
ineffective for failing to perfect an appeal from the order
transferring her for adult adjudication, since, due to the
overwhelming evidence against her, she has failed to demonstrate
that the transfer order would have been overturned on appeal.
She has therefore failed to demonstrate prejudice. See
id.
AFFIRMED.