Filed: Apr. 23, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-60640 Summary Calendar _ LUIS ARMANDO GIRON, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A71 559 117 - April 19, 2001 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Luis Armando Giron, a native of El Salvador, petitions this court for review os the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision denying his ap
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-60640 Summary Calendar _ LUIS ARMANDO GIRON, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A71 559 117 - April 19, 2001 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Luis Armando Giron, a native of El Salvador, petitions this court for review os the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision denying his app..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 00-60640
Summary Calendar
__________________
LUIS ARMANDO GIRON,
Petitioner,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
--------------------
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A71 559 117
--------------------
April 19, 2001
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Luis Armando Giron, a native of El Salvador, petitions this
court for review os the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)
decision denying his application for political asylum and his
request for a voluntary departure. Giron argues that his
misrepresentation at the hearing about not having been previously
arrested was not material to a determination whether he had a
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 00-60640
-2-
well-founded fear of persecution supporting his claim for asylum
or whether he was eligible for voluntary departure.
The BIA based its denial of Giron’s application for
political asylum and his request for voluntary departure upon the
Immigration Judge’s finding that Giron was not a credible witness
and that his claims of persecution were unbelievable. This court
does not review BIA decisions based purely on the Immigration
Judge’s assessment of the alien’s credibility. Chun v. INS,
40
F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994). Giron’s petition for review of the
BIA decision is DENIED.