Filed: Dec. 14, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-10028 Summary Calendar LAWRENCE WAYNE AUTREY, Petitioner-Appellant, versus JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CV-1053-Y - December 14, 2001 Before JONES, SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Laurence W. Autrey (“Autrey”), Texas state prisoner #
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-10028 Summary Calendar LAWRENCE WAYNE AUTREY, Petitioner-Appellant, versus JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Respondent-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CV-1053-Y - December 14, 2001 Before JONES, SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Laurence W. Autrey (“Autrey”), Texas state prisoner # ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-10028
Summary Calendar
LAWRENCE WAYNE AUTREY,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF
CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,
Respondent-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:99-CV-1053-Y
--------------------
December 14, 2001
Before JONES, SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Laurence W. Autrey (“Autrey”), Texas state prisoner
# 665650, appeals the denial of his petition for writ of habeas
corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He argues that there
was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for burglary
of a habitation with intent to commit aggravated sexual assault.
We have reviewed the record, the briefs of the parties, and
the applicable law, and we find no reversible error. The Texas
Court of Appeals did not unreasonably conclude that any rational
trier of fact could have found, beyond a reasonable doubt, that
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-10028
-2-
the evidence showed that Autrey had the intent to commit sexual
assault. See Williams v. Taylor,
529 U.S. 362, 409 (2000);
Jackson v. Virginia,
443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979). The district
court’s judgment denying Autrey’s habeas petition is AFFIRMED.