Filed: Aug. 23, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-10231 Conference Calendar CARL BERNARD HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus D. GOODWIN, Correctional Officer III; NO FIRST NAME HAMPTON, Captain; NO FIRST NAME SHIPP, Counsel Substitute; NO FIRST NAME WHITAKER, Captain; G. CLOWER, UGI; JOE DOMINGUES, Warden, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:00-CV-230 - - - - - - - - - - August 22, 2
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-10231 Conference Calendar CARL BERNARD HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus D. GOODWIN, Correctional Officer III; NO FIRST NAME HAMPTON, Captain; NO FIRST NAME SHIPP, Counsel Substitute; NO FIRST NAME WHITAKER, Captain; G. CLOWER, UGI; JOE DOMINGUES, Warden, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:00-CV-230 - - - - - - - - - - August 22, 20..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-10231
Conference Calendar
CARL BERNARD HARRIS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
D. GOODWIN, Correctional Officer III;
NO FIRST NAME HAMPTON, Captain; NO
FIRST NAME SHIPP, Counsel Substitute;
NO FIRST NAME WHITAKER, Captain;
G. CLOWER, UGI; JOE DOMINGUES, Warden,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:00-CV-230
- - - - - - - - - -
August 22, 2001
Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Carl Bernard Harris, Texas prisoner # 806634, appeals from
the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint
as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief
can be granted, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. We have reviewed the record,
Harris’s brief, and the applicable law, and we discern no
reversible error in the district court’s judgment of dismissal.
Accordingly, we AFFIRM on the facts as found, authorities cited,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-10231
-2-
and analysis made by the magistrate judge in his comprehensive
Report and Recommendation, duly adopted by the district court.
See Harris v. Goodwin et al., No. 2:00-CV-0230 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 8,
2001).