Filed: Dec. 04, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-10442 Summary Calendar JANICE W. STEVENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; PAUL BROWN, U.S. District Judge, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:01-CV-301-X - December 4, 2001 Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Janice W. Stevenson appeals the dismissal of her suit in the U.S. District Court for the Nor
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-10442 Summary Calendar JANICE W. STEVENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; PAUL BROWN, U.S. District Judge, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:01-CV-301-X - December 4, 2001 Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Janice W. Stevenson appeals the dismissal of her suit in the U.S. District Court for the Nort..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-10442
Summary Calendar
JANICE W. STEVENSON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;
PAUL BROWN, U.S. District Judge,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:01-CV-301-X
--------------------
December 4, 2001
Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Janice W. Stevenson appeals the dismissal of her suit in the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas for lack of
proper venue. Review of the record reveals that the Northern
District is not an appropriate venue for an FTCA claim because
Stevenson is a resident of and the complained of act or omission
are in the Eastern District. See 28 U.S.C. § 1402(b). Nor is the
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-10442
-2-
Northern District an appropriate venue for Stevenson’s other
claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e).
Although the district court could have transferred this case
to the Eastern District, it cannot be said that the district court
abused its discretion in not doing so. See Lowery v. Estelle,
533
F.2d 265, 267 (5th Cir. 1976). The decision of the district court
is AFFIRMED. Stevenson’s motion to consolidate is DISMISSED as
moot.