Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Sanchez-Guiterrez, 01-20340 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-20340 Visitors: 27
Filed: Dec. 28, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20340 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERNESTO SANCHEZ-GUITERREZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-762-1 - December 27, 2001 Before JOLLY, DAVIS and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ernesto Sanchez-Guiterrez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                           No. 01-20340
                         Summary Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERNESTO SANCHEZ-GUITERREZ,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.
                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. H-00-CR-762-1
                       --------------------
                         December 27, 2001
Before JOLLY, DAVIS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ernesto

Sanchez-Guiterrez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Sanchez has been provided a copy of counsel’s brief and motion

but has not filed a response.   Our independent review of

counsel’s Anders brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal.   Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.   5th Cir.

R. 42.2.



     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer