Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McCowan v. State of Texas, 01-20900 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-20900 Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 12, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20900 Conference Calendar J.W. MCCOWAN, Petitioner-Appellant, versus THE STATE OF TEXAS, Respondent-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CV-1440 - December 11, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* J.W. McCowan, Texas prisoner #786708, filed an appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of manda
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 01-20900
                         Conference Calendar



J.W. MCCOWAN,

                                          Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                                          Respondent-Appellee.

                       ---------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                       USDC No. H-01-CV-1440
                       ---------------------
                         December 11, 2001
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     J.W. McCowan, Texas prisoner #786708, filed an appeal from

the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of

mandamus.   See 28 U.S.C. § 1361.   The district court dismissed

the petition for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.     McCowan

now moves this court for a voluntary dismissal of his appeal

without prejudice.

     Section 1361 does not provide jurisdiction for McCowan’s

suit because he does not seek to compel performance from an

officer or employee of the United States.      McCowan concedes that


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                            No. 01-20900
                                - 2 -

he cannot establish jurisdiction.   The instant appeal, however,

does not qualify for dismissal without prejudice.   See Fed.

R. App. P. 42(b); 5th Cir. R. 42.4.   Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED with prejudice.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer