Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Young, 01-40007 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-40007 Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 23, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40007 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DEVIN YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CR-30-ALL - August 23, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Assistant Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Devin Young has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed
More
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                              No. 01-40007
                          Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DEVIN YOUNG,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                          --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Eastern District of Texas
                        USDC No. 1:00-CR-30-ALL
                          --------------------
                             August 23, 2001

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Assistant Federal Public Defender appointed to represent

Devin Young has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).      Young

has received copies of counsel’s motion and brief but did not

file a response.     Our independent review of counsel’s brief and

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.     Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer