Filed: Oct. 30, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40025 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARCELINO BALDEMAR MALDONADO-SILVA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-00-CR-751-ALL - October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marcelino Baldemar Maldonado-Silva has moved for leav
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40025 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARCELINO BALDEMAR MALDONADO-SILVA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-00-CR-751-ALL - October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marcelino Baldemar Maldonado-Silva has moved for leave..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-40025
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARCELINO BALDEMAR MALDONADO-SILVA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. L-00-CR-751-ALL
--------------------
October 29, 2001
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Marcelino
Baldemar Maldonado-Silva has moved for leave to withdraw and has
filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Maldonado-Silva has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.