Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Alvarado, 01-40065 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-40065 Visitors: 45
Filed: Aug. 23, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40065 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDGAR ALVARADO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-368-1 - August 23, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edgar Alvarado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a br
More
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                              No. 01-40065
                          Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDGAR ALVARADO,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                         --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Texas
                        USDC No. B-00-CR-368-1
                         --------------------
                            August 23, 2001

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edgar

Alvarado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).      Alvarado

has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but has not

filed a response.     Our review of the brief filed by counsel and

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer