Filed: Aug. 23, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40065 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDGAR ALVARADO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-368-1 - August 23, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edgar Alvarado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a br
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40065 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus EDGAR ALVARADO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-368-1 - August 23, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edgar Alvarado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a bri..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-40065
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EDGAR ALVARADO,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-00-CR-368-1
--------------------
August 23, 2001
Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Edgar
Alvarado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Alvarado
has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but has not
filed a response. Our review of the brief filed by counsel and
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.