Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Garcia-Cruz, 01-40074 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-40074 Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 30, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40074 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JESUS GARCIA-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-397-1 - October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus Garcia-Cruz has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                             No. 01-40074
                         Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS GARCIA-CRUZ,

                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. B-00-CR-397-1
                      --------------------
                        October 29, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jesus

Garcia-Cruz has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Garcia-Cruz has not responded to the motion.    Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal.    Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the appeal is DISMISSED.    See 5th Cir. R. 42.2

     MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.




     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer