Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Espino-Gonzalez, 01-40076 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-40076 Visitors: 36
Filed: Oct. 30, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40076 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALBINO ESPINO-GONZALEZ, also known as Lino Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-351-1 - October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Albino Espino-Gonzales (Espino) has re
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 01-40076
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALBINO ESPINO-GONZALEZ,
also known as Lino Gonzalez,

                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. B-00-CR-351-1
                       --------------------
                         October 29, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Albino

Espino-Gonzales (Espino) has requested leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Espino has not responded to the motion.   Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal.   Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the appeal is DISMISSED.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer