Filed: Aug. 23, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40165 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus REYNALDO VASQUEZ-MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-53-ALL - August 21, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Reynaldo Vasquez-Mendoza appeals the 66-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40165 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus REYNALDO VASQUEZ-MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-53-ALL - August 21, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Reynaldo Vasquez-Mendoza appeals the 66-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-40165
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
REYNALDO VASQUEZ-MENDOZA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:00-CR-53-ALL
--------------------
August 21, 2001
Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Reynaldo Vasquez-Mendoza appeals the 66-month sentence
imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found
in the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C.
§ 1326. He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in
his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element
of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment.
Vasquez-Mendoza acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed
by the Supreme Court's decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United
States,
523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-40165
-2-
for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v.
New Jersey,
530 U.S. 466 (2000).
Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See
Apprendi,
530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit,
231 F.3d 979, 984
(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied,
121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Vasquez-
Mendoza’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED.