Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Banda-Lopez, 01-40435 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-40435 Visitors: 39
Filed: Oct. 30, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40435 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANIEL BANDA-LOPEZ, also known as Daniel Lopez-Hernandez, also known as George Lara, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-00-CR-548-1 - October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel
More
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                             No. 01-40435
                         Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus

DANIEL BANDA-LOPEZ, also
known as Daniel Lopez-Hernandez,
also known as George Lara,
                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. M-00-CR-548-1
                       --------------------
                         October 29, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel

Banda-Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

in accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).

Banda was provided with a copy of counsel’s Anders motion and

brief, but he has not filed a response.    Our independent review

of the record and counsel’s brief shows that there are no

nonfrivolous issues for appeal.    Accordingly, counsel’s motion

for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED.    See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer