Filed: Dec. 10, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40869 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus IGNACIO TORRES-LOPEZ, also known as Ruben Gonzalez-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-01-CR-202-1 _ December 6, 2001 Before POLITZ, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendant
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-40869 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus IGNACIO TORRES-LOPEZ, also known as Ruben Gonzalez-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-01-CR-202-1 _ December 6, 2001 Before POLITZ, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel for the defendant,..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-40869
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
IGNACIO TORRES-LOPEZ, also known as Ruben Gonzalez-Lopez,
Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. M-01-CR-202-1
_________________________________________
December 6, 2001
Before POLITZ, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel for
the defendant, Ignacio Torres-Lopez, and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
California.1 Torres has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief and has filed
a response.
Our independent review of the record, Torres’ response to counsel’s motion,
and controlling jurisprudence discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 2
1
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
2 th
5 Cir. R. 42.2.
2