Filed: Jul. 26, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50192 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALFONSO ALVARADO-OLIVAS, also known as Alfonso Alvarado, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-1012-ALL-H - - - - - - - - - - July 26, 2001 Before DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:1 Alfonso Alvarado-Olivas appeals his sentence
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50192 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ALFONSO ALVARADO-OLIVAS, also known as Alfonso Alvarado, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-1012-ALL-H - - - - - - - - - - July 26, 2001 Before DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:1 Alfonso Alvarado-Olivas appeals his sentence ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-50192
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ALFONSO ALVARADO-OLIVAS, also known as Alfonso Alvarado, Jr.,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. EP-00-CR-1012-ALL-H
- - - - - - - - - -
July 26, 2001
Before DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:1
Alfonso Alvarado-Olivas appeals his sentence from his guilty-
plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation in violation
of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that the 16-level enhancement under
U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) “is grossly disproportional to the
offense in question” and in violation of the Eighth Amendment’s
prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. In United States
v. Cardenas-Alvarez,
987 F.2d 1129, 1134 (5th Cir. 1993), this
court rejected an Eighth Amendment challenge to a 100-month
sentence imposed for attempted illegal reentry. Similarly,
1
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Alvarado-Olivas’s 70-month sentence, which was based upon an
ordinary application of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A), does not violate
the Eighth Amendment.
AFFIRMED.
2