Filed: Dec. 13, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50288 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ENRIQUE GALLARDO-CAPUCHINO, also known as Pedro Perez-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-CR-690-1 - December 12, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Enrique Gallardo-Capuc
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50288 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ENRIQUE GALLARDO-CAPUCHINO, also known as Pedro Perez-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-CR-690-1 - December 12, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Enrique Gallardo-Capuch..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-50288
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ENRIQUE GALLARDO-CAPUCHINO, also known as
Pedro Perez-Gonzalez,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. DR-CR-690-1
--------------------
December 12, 2001
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Enrique
Gallardo-Capuchino on appeal has moved to withdraw and has filed
a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Gallardo has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but
has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R.
42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.