Filed: Dec. 21, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50416 Summary Calendar JOHN DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CA-349-DB - December 18, 2001 Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* John Doe appeals the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his Federal Tort Claims Act claims for quantum meruit based on his all
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-50416 Summary Calendar JOHN DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CA-349-DB - December 18, 2001 Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* John Doe appeals the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of his Federal Tort Claims Act claims for quantum meruit based on his alle..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-50416
Summary Calendar
JOHN DOE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. EP-00-CA-349-DB
--------------------
December 18, 2001
Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
John Doe appeals the dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of
his Federal Tort Claims Act claims for quantum meruit based on
his alleged service to the Government as a confidential
informant. Under Texas law, recovery under the theory of quantum
meruit is considered recovery on a quasi-contract or a contract
implied in law. See Lone Star Steel Co. v. Scott,
759 S.W.2d
144, 154 (Tex. App. 1988). The FTCA is a limited waiver of
sovereign immunity for certain types of tort actions. See Laird
v. Nelms,
406 U.S. 797, 798-99 (1972). Doe’s complaint does not
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-50416
-2-
sound in tort, and the district court had no jurisdiction to hear
his claim under the FTCA. See Davis v. United States,
961 F.2d
53, 56 (5th Cir. 1991). The decision of the district court is
AFFIRMED.