Filed: Jun. 14, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-60738 Conference Calendar MELVIN GAMAGE, Petitioner-Appellant, versus WALTER BOOKER, Respondent-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:99-CV-264-R-A - June 14, 2001 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659 , 660 (5th Cir. 19
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-60738 Conference Calendar MELVIN GAMAGE, Petitioner-Appellant, versus WALTER BOOKER, Respondent-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:99-CV-264-R-A - June 14, 2001 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659 , 660 (5th Cir. 198..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-60738
Conference Calendar
MELVIN GAMAGE,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
WALTER BOOKER,
Respondent-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 1:99-CV-264-R-A
--------------------
June 14, 2001
Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its
own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby,
813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th
Cir. 1987). Melvin Gamage, Mississippi prisoner # 58703, appeals
the district court's order transferring his successive 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 habeas corpus petition to this court for a determination
whether the district court should be authorized to consider it.
In transferring the petition, the district court relied on 28
U.S.C. § 1631. Under these circumstances, the transfer order is
a nonappealable interlocutory order. See Brinar v. Williamson,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 99-60738
-2-
___ F.3d ___,
2001 WL 273844 *2 (5th Cir. Apr. 4, 2001, No. 00-
50428) (28 U.S.C. § 2255 case). Accordingly, the appeal is
DISMISSED.