Filed: Apr. 12, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50286 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHARLES EDWARD MURPHY, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-99-CR-92-1 - April 11, 2002 Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Charles Edward Murphy has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. Cali
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-50286 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHARLES EDWARD MURPHY, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-99-CR-92-1 - April 11, 2002 Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed to represent Charles Edward Murphy has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. Calif..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-50286
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHARLES EDWARD MURPHY,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. MO-99-CR-92-1
--------------------
April 11, 2002
Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Charles Edward Murphy has
moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Murphy has received a copy of
counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our
independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED. Counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.