Filed: Feb. 25, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-10316 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LEROY JOSEPH DOUCETTE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-178-2-A - February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel representing Leroy Joseph Doucette has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursu
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-10316 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LEROY JOSEPH DOUCETTE, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-178-2-A - February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel representing Leroy Joseph Doucette has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursua..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-10316
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LEROY JOSEPH DOUCETTE,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:00-CR-178-2-A
--------------------
February 21, 2002
Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel representing Leroy Joseph Doucette
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Doucette has not
filed a response. Our independent review of the record and
counsel’s brief shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for
appeal. Consequently, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
