Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Ramirez, 01-11480 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-11480 Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 23, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-11480 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE ALFONSO RAMIREZ, also known as Pepe, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:01-CR-41-1-C - August 21, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jose Alfonso Ramirez appeals his guilty-plea convictions and sentences for conspiracy to possess c
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                            No. 01-11480
                        Conference Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE ALFONSO RAMIREZ, also known as Pepe,

                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 5:01-CR-41-1-C
                       --------------------
                          August 21, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Jose Alfonso Ramirez appeals his guilty-plea convictions and

sentences for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to

distribute, possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, and

distribution of cocaine.    He contends that 21 U.S.C.

ยง 841(b)(1)(A) and (B) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi

v. New Jersey, 
530 U.S. 466
(2000).    As Ramirez concedes, his

argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent, but he raises the


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 01-11480
                                -2-

issue to preserve it for Supreme Court review.   See United States

v. Slaughter, 
238 F.3d 580
, 582 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied,

532 U.S. 1045
(2001).   The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer