Filed: Aug. 23, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-11480 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE ALFONSO RAMIREZ, also known as Pepe, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:01-CR-41-1-C - August 21, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jose Alfonso Ramirez appeals his guilty-plea convictions and sentences for conspiracy to possess c
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-11480 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE ALFONSO RAMIREZ, also known as Pepe, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:01-CR-41-1-C - August 21, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jose Alfonso Ramirez appeals his guilty-plea convictions and sentences for conspiracy to possess co..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-11480
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE ALFONSO RAMIREZ, also known as Pepe,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:01-CR-41-1-C
--------------------
August 21, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jose Alfonso Ramirez appeals his guilty-plea convictions and
sentences for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to
distribute, possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, and
distribution of cocaine. He contends that 21 U.S.C.
ยง 841(b)(1)(A) and (B) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi
v. New Jersey,
530 U.S. 466 (2000). As Ramirez concedes, his
argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent, but he raises the
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-11480
-2-
issue to preserve it for Supreme Court review. See United States
v. Slaughter,
238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied,
532 U.S. 1045 (2001). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.