Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Skinner v. Staples, 01-20481 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-20481 Visitors: 40
Filed: Mar. 08, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-20481 _ Henry SKINNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, V. Steve Carey STAPLES, et al. Respondents-Appellees. _ Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas (H-99-0603) _ March 7, 2002 Before ALDISERT*, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:** Plaintiff-appellant Henry Skinner appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in his § 1983 suit against various prison
More
                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                 _____________________________________

                             No. 01-20481
                 _____________________________________


                            Henry SKINNER,

                                             Plaintiff-Appellant,

                                  V.

                     Steve Carey STAPLES, et al.

                                             Respondents-Appellees.


          __________________________________________________

             Appeal from the United States District Court
                  For the Southern District of Texas
                              (H-99-0603)
          __________________________________________________
                             March 7, 2002

Before ALDISERT*, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:**

     Plaintiff-appellant Henry Skinner appeals from the district

court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in his

§ 1983 suit against various prison officials.   We affirm the

judgment of the district court essentially for the reasons stated

in Judge Rosenthal’s thorough opinion of March 31, 2001.

     AFFIRMED.



     *
      Circuit Judge of the Third Circuit, sitting by designation.
     **
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the
limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer