Filed: Jun. 21, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20770 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TERRY DWAYNE HENRY, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-771-1 - June 18, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court appointed counsel representing Terry Dewayne Henry has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a br
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20770 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TERRY DWAYNE HENRY, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-771-1 - June 18, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court appointed counsel representing Terry Dewayne Henry has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a bri..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-20770
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TERRY DWAYNE HENRY,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-00-CR-771-1
--------------------
June 18, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court appointed counsel representing Terry Dewayne Henry has
requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Henry has
not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and
the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
