Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Garza-Garza, 01-20915 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-20915 Visitors: 22
Filed: Oct. 08, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-20915 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROMUALDO GARZA-GARZA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-914-1 - October 7, 2002 Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Attorney Jonathan J. Paull, appointed to represent Romualdo Garza-Garza (“Garza”), has requested leave to withdraw and has file
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                           No. 01-20915
                         Summary Calendar



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROMUALDO GARZA-GARZA,

                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
           Appeal from the United States District Court
                for the Southern District of Texas
                      USDC No. H-00-CR-914-1
                       --------------------
                          October 7, 2002

Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

          Attorney   Jonathan   J.   Paull,    appointed   to   represent

Romualdo Garza-Garza (“Garza”), has requested leave to withdraw and

has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Garza has not responded to the motion.       Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal.    Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,




     *
      Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                            No. 01-20915
                                 -2-

counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is

DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

          MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer