Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Williams, 01-30435 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 01-30435 Visitors: 22
Filed: Dec. 03, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-30435 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RON WILLIAMS, also known as Shorty, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-170-17-N - November 27, 2002 Before KING, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Court-appointed counsel for Ron Williams has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
More
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                              No. 01-30435
                            Summary Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RON WILLIAMS, also known as Shorty,

                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                          --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Eastern District of Louisiana
                        USDC No. 00-CR-170-17-N
                          --------------------
                            November 27, 2002

Before KING, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit
Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Court-appointed counsel for Ron Williams has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders

v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).     Williams has received a

copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a pro se

brief of his own.     Our review of the brief filed by counsel and

of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer