Filed: Feb. 25, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-30799 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHARLES RAY BLAIR, also known as Ray Blair, also known as Jay Brown, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 98-CR-30023-1 - February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Charles Ray Blair appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-30799 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHARLES RAY BLAIR, also known as Ray Blair, also known as Jay Brown, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 98-CR-30023-1 - February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Charles Ray Blair appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-30799
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHARLES RAY BLAIR, also known as Ray Blair,
also known as Jay Brown,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 98-CR-30023-1
--------------------
February 21, 2002
Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Charles Ray Blair appeals his conviction and sentence for
conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and
cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846.
Blair argues that the indictment failed to allege a drug quantity
or a leadership role in the offense in violation of Apprendi v.
New Jersey,
530 U.S. 466 (2000). He also contends that 21 U.S.C.
§§ 841(a), (b), and 846 are unconstitutional.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-30799
-2-
Although Blair’s indictment did not allege a drug quantity
or leadership role, he was not sentenced in excess of the 20-year
statutory maximum under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C). Consequently,
there was no Apprendi violation. United States v. Doggett,
230
F.3d 160, 166 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied,
531 U.S. 1177
(2001); United States v. Keith,
230 F.3d 784, 787 (5th Cir.
2000), cert. denied,
531 U.S. 1182 (2001). The constitutionality
of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a), (b), and 846 has been upheld by this
court. See United States v. Slaughter,
238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th
Cir. 2000), cert. denied,
532 U.S. 1045 (2001). Accordingly,
Blair’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.